OOPSLA
'97
Monday October 6, 1997 - Atlanta, Georgia,USA
Workshop
(27) OO Behavioral Semantics
(with an Emphasis on Semantics of large
OO Business Specifications)
There have been 23 submissions accepted. The list
of contents can be found here. The workshop proceedings were available
at the workshop and during the OOPSLA poster session.
Proceedings:The workshop papers are available
as technical report called "OOPSLA'97 Workshop on Object-oriented Behavioral
Semantics (with an Emphasis on Semantics of Large OO Business Specifications)"
from the Munich University of Technology. We ran out of copies.
The workshop was a real success. Conclusions and a workshop summary
will be published in the OOPSLA'97 Addendum: Here
is a preprint.
There is a similar
workshop at ECOOP'98
Call for Papers:
Workshop themes:
Business specifications are used to describe and understand businesses
(and, in particular, business rules) independently of any computing systems
used for their possible automation. They have to express this understanding
in a simple, clear, precise, and explicit way, in order to provide the
essential common ground between business domain experts and software developers.
It follows that, for example, business specifications do not have to provide
an owner for system state or behavior (as in message passing): such owners
are required by legacy OO approaches which have nothing to do with business
specifications.
Precise specification of semantics as opposed to just signatures
is essential not only for business specifications, but also for business
designs and system specifications. In particular, it is needed for appropriate
handling of viewpoints which exist both horizontally within the same
frame of reference, such as within a business specification - and vertically
within different frames of reference. In order to handle the complexity
of a (new or existing) large system, it must be considered, on the one
hand, as a composition of separate viewpoints, and on the other hand, as
an integrated whole, probably at a different abstraction level.
Concepts and constructs ("patterns") common to all, or a large number
of, businesses are being specified for reuse, leading to savings in intellectual
effort, time and money. Moreover, precise business patterns, such as "composition-containment",
"satisfaction", "decision", "contract", and so on, substantially ease the
elicitation of business requirements during walkthroughs with business
customers, and support separation of concerns using viewpoints. Business
specifications (the "what"s) are refined into business designs (the "how"s),
from where refinements into various information system (software) specifications
and implementations are possible.
The aim of the workshop which continues the tradition of the five
successful OOPSLA workshops on behavioral semantics is to bring together
theoreticians and practitioners to report on their experience with making
semantics precise (perhaps even formal) and explicit in OO business specifica-
tions, business designs, and system specifications.
Topics
include, but are not limited to: ?
-
business specifications ?
-
precise specification of semantics ?
-
semantics of OO modeling approaches ?
-
semantics-preserving refinement strategies ?
-
viewpoint modelling ?
-
standards ?
-
business patterns (reusable fragments of specifi- cation)
-
?related tool support.
Organizers:
Bernhard Rumpe
Institut fuer Informatik, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, 80333 Munich,
Germany
Haim Kilov
Merrill Lynch, New York, USA
Ian Simmonds
IBM T J Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, USA
Proceedings:
will be printed as a technical report of the Munich University of Technology
and will be available at the workshop.
Important Dates:
-
Deadline for submission: August 15, 1997
-
Notification of acceptance: August 18, 1997
Further Information:
http://www.se-rwth.de/~rumpe/publications/oopsla-ws/
or via email to the organizers.
Submissions:
Workshop submissions should be about 5-7 pages and shall be sent as standard
Postscript or MS Word files electronically to Bernhard Rumpe.
Authors are encouraged to present open questions, including one or two
statements suitable for discussion.
Bernhard Rumpe, 24-5-97